Today (13th of March, 2018) I felt like I needed some more structure in my codebase.
I’ve already been naming the files based on their type (screen or component), but this is not the best way to structure them in my opinion. I’ve done this for a long time, and it’s great, but from today onwards I will try a new structure and here is my motivation…..
The app is getting big. Or is it? It’s approaching 10k lines (excluding old code). I guessed it would be more! I also had 5k lines after a week. Seems I spent way more time on figuring out and changing things I wrote earlier. Maybe because I end up searching for code a lot?
In my opinion, you shouldn’t structure it unless there is a clear advantage in finding files and pieces in files. In the beginning, it costs more time because you’re moving around files all the time. Later it may become useful because it’s kind of an extra description for your files. You will be able to find what you need more easily, and it makes more sense.
So since today, I divided my client-side react-native code into a few different folders: fat, pure, screens, universal, wrappers, and old.
P.S. this post inspired me to do it, and is also good reading material.
Whut? Components that include data from React-Apollo (Using GraphQL).
Motivation: It’s good to know if you include a component if it already includes data. Otherwise, you have to open the component to check whether it does.
Whut? “People say that a component is pure if it is guaranteed to return the same result given the same props and state.” – Dan Abramov
Motivation: It’s good to know if a component doesn’t contain any GraphQL Data (yet). Pure components don’t. However, sometimes (more often than not) they need data or props. Make sure to specify this by typing the props using Typescript, or having a ‘prop’-er (🤪 haha I’m so fanny) comment/description above the component. This way you never have to look into the component anymore, which saves a lot of time and brain capacity. 😃
Whut?: Screen components are included directly at the navigation and are a full screen.
Motivation: It’s good to know if something is a whole screen. The biggest reason is that you know what kind of props it will get because this is the same on every screen.
Whut?: These are just pure components that I intend to open source.
Motivation: It’s good to know your plans because the way you program depends on it. This gives me more incentive to create open source code that can be shared! 😊
Whut: Wrappers are pure components that take the same name as an existing component, but wrap around it to sometimes change it a little.
Motivation: For example, I can add some props to a button, or create a different source for any button in the whole app if the library I used for buttons breaks. Wrappers are also pure components as they don’t add data from Apollo. But it’s good to make this distinction because you know it’s an extension (or the exact same) as a common component.